HRO inside living site by highway. Escorted to parkinglot. PN head straight to HRO to ask them to leave as they are on a private terrain. PN states “on a infracturer la loi actuallement”,HRO demands “quel code penal svp”, to which the chef d’op answers “the french penal code”, after asking the article, she insists for HRO to leave despite HRO insisting their lawyer has confirmed there is no infraction.

PN filming with professional phone. PN stepping on HROs toes and light pushes HRO. One HRO walks a bit slower filming the eviction behind the escort. The PN touches HRO to make him recule. HRO asks for the PN not to touch him and insists he is reculing. The PN steps on HROs toes. PN asks HRO to go to the parking. HRO keeps filming walking backwards. A second female PN starts filming HRO in a provoking way. 2008 and deontology for filming is discussed. HRO slaloms with PN who keeps stepping infront of the camera. A third PN joins the escort. There is no RIO for the PN slaloming. The PN takes out his professional phone to being filming as well.

see intimidation

PN states “on a infracturer la loi actuallement”,HRO demands “qual code penal svp”, to which the chef d’op answers “the french penal code”, after asking the article, she insists for HRO to leave despite HRO insisting their lawyer has confirmed there is no infraction.

Base légale : Chef d'op “comme d’habitude, flagrance”

2 banalisee